Great Southland Limited v. Landash Corporation, et al.

Filing 152

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is RECOMMENDED that default judgment be entered against Defendants Giant Tyres USA, LLC; Midwest Coal, LLC; A&B Retreading, LLC; Adkins Tire, LLC; Elephant OTR, LLC; Rebekah Holding; Knight Nguyen Investments; Jason Ad kins; and Rebekah Adkins in an amount to be determined by the District Court upon further submissions. Objections to R&R due by 7/8/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 6/24/2020. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification)

Case: 2:17-cv-00719-SDM-KAJ Doc #: 152 Filed: 06/24/20 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 2125

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

GREAT SOUTHLAND LIMITED,
Plaintiff,
v.

Civil Action 2:17-cv-719
Judge Sarah D. Morrison
Magistrate Judge Jolson

LANDASH CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On February 11, 2020, the Court directed Defendants Giant Tyres USA, LLC; Midwest
Coal, LLC; A&B Retreading, LLC; Adkins Tire, LLC; Elephant OTR, LLC; Rebekah Holding;
and Knight Nguyen Investments to obtain counsel, noting that corporations may appear in
federal court only if represented by licensed counsel. (Doc. 112 at 1–2). Further, because Great
Southland Limited, XPO Logistics, Inc., and Fox, Byrd & Company, P.C., represented that
Defendants Jason Adkins and Rebekah Adkins have been unresponsive to their requests to meet
and confer, the Court ordered Jason and Rebekah Adkins to show cause within 30 days for
failing to comply with the Court’s meet and confer directive. (Id. at 2).
Defendants failed to respond to the show cause order.

So, on April 6, 2020, the

Undersigned afforded them one more opportunity to show cause within thirty (30) days, warning
that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that they be found in default. (Doc. 128).
That deadline has passed, and again, none of the above-named Defendants have responded to the

Case: 2:17-cv-00719-SDM-KAJ Doc #: 152 Filed: 06/24/20 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 2126

Court’s show cause order. Further, the order was returned as undeliverable as to Defendants
Midwest Coal, LLC and Knight Nguyen Investments.
The corporate Defendants, Giant Tyres USA, LLC; Midwest Coal, LLC; A&B
Retreading, LLC; Adkins Tire, LLC; Elephant OTR, LLC; Rebekah Holding; and Knight
Nguyen Investments, remain unrepresented in this case. As already explained, “[t]he law is
well-settled that a corporation may appear in federal courts only through licensed counsel and
not through the pro se representation of an officer, agent, or shareholder.” Nat’l Labor Relations
Bd. v. Consol. Food Servs., Inc., 81 F. App’x 13, 15 (6th Cir. 2003). “This rule also applies to
limited liability corporations.” Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc. v. Mich. Resin Reps., LLC, No. 1113335, 2013 WL 1799858, at *8 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 5, 2013), report and recommendation adopted
sub nom. Barrette Outdoor Living v. Mich. Resin Reps., LLC, No. 11-13335, 2013 WL 1800356
(E.D. Mich. Apr. 29, 2013) (citations omitted).
Though the Undersigned has considered sanctions short of default, because these
Defendants cannot appear as a pro se entities, and moreover, have been given multiple
opportunities to secure counsel, “a less drastic remedy does not appear appropriate.”

Id.

(recommending that LLC defendant be found in default for failing to secure counsel). As for
Defendants Jason Adkins and Rebekah Adkins, the Court finds that their failure to participate in
this case, despite multiple warnings, “evidences willfulness sufficient to warrant the sanction of
default judgment.” Davis v. Ivy, No. 11-CV-10803, 2013 WL 1505431, at *3 (E.D. Mich. Apr.
12, 2013).
Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that default judgment be entered against
Defendants Giant Tyres USA, LLC; Midwest Coal, LLC; A&B Retreading, LLC; Adkins Tire,

2

Case: 2:17-cv-00719-SDM-KAJ Doc #: 152 Filed: 06/24/20 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 2127

LLC; Elephant OTR, LLC; Rebekah Holding; Knight Nguyen Investments; Jason Adkins; and
Rebekah Adkins in an amount to be determined by the District Court upon further submissions.
Procedure on Objections
If any party objects to this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within
fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report, file and serve on all parties written objections to
those specific proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made, together with
supporting authority for the objection(s).

A Judge of this Court shall make a de novo

determination of those portions of the Report or specified proposed findings or recommendations
to which objection is made. Upon proper objections, a Judge of this Court may accept, reject, or
modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made herein, may receive further
evidence or may recommit this matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1).
The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and
Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to have the District Judge review the Report
and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of
the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140
(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: June 24, 2020

/s/ Kimberly A. Jolson
KIMBERLY A. JOLSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3