Great Southland Limited v. Landash Corporation, et al.
Filing
155
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 152 . For the reasons set forth in the R&R, default judgment is hereby entered against Defendants Giant Tyres USA, LLC; Midwest Coal, LLC; A&B Retreading, LLC; Adkins Tire, LLC; Elephant OTR, LLC; Rebekah Hol ding; Knight Nguyen Investments; Jason Adkins; and Rebekah Adkins in an amount to be determined after resolution of all claims. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 7/14/2020. (tb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Case: 2:17-cv-00719-SDM-KAJ Doc #: 155 Filed: 07/14/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 2133
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
GREAT SOUTHLAND LIMITED,
Plaintiff,
v.
LANDASH CORPORATION, et al.
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No.: 2:17-CV-719
Judge Sarah D. Morrison
Magistrate Judge Jolson
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of a Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) issued by Magistrate Judge Jolson on June 24, 2020. (ECF No. 152). The time for
filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. 1 Therefore, the Court ADOPTS
the R&R. For the reasons set forth in the R&R, default judgment is hereby entered against
Defendants Giant Tyres USA, LLC; Midwest Coal, LLC; A&B Retreading, LLC; Adkins Tire,
LLC; Elephant OTR, LLC; Rebekah Holding; Knight Nguyen Investments; Jason Adkins; and
Rebekah Adkins in an amount to be determined after resolution of all claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Sarah D. Morrison
SARAH D. MORRISON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Defendants XPO Logistics, Inc. and XPO Global Forwarding, Inc. (“XPO”) filed a
response (ECF No. 153) to the R&R disputing any attempt to impute the defaulting parties’
liability to XPO. The response did not object to the R&R.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?