Prasad-Shrmanjadun v. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security et al

Filing 16

ORDER adopting 14 the Report and Recommendation; granting 9 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss; granting 12 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 4/26/18. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Prasad Shrmanjadun Bhim, Case No. 2:17-cv-765 Petitioner, Judge Michael H. Watson V. Magistrate Judge Cheisey Vascura Jefferson B. Sessions, Ml, et al., Respondents. ORDER On April 10, 2018, Magistrate Judge Vascura issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Respondent's motion to dismiss, EOF No. 9, and supplemental motion to dismiss, EOF No. 12, be granted and that this action be dismissed. EOF No. 14. Magistrate Judge Vascura notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Id. at 2. She also specificaiiy advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. at 2-3. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. Respondent's motion to dismiss, EOF No. 9, and supplemental motion to dismiss, EOF No. 12, are GRANTED consistent with Magistrate Judge Vascura's recommendation in the R&R. This action Is DISMISSED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case No. 2:17-cv-765 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?