Holland v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 23 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 12/7/18. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
KImberly Holland,
Parent on behalf of child, M.D.H.,
Plaintiff,
V.
Case No. 2:17-cv-865
Commissioner of Social Security,
Judge Michael H. Watson
Magistrate Judge Vascura
Defendant.
ORDER
On November 20,2018, United States Magistrate Judge Vascura, to whom
this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order
14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division of Columbus, filed a
Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Kimberiy
Holland's ("Piaintiff") Complaint, on behalf of her minor child, M.D.H., in this
Social Security case. The R&R recommended overruling PiaintifTs statement of
errors and affirming the Commissioner's decision. R&R 1, ECF No. 23.
The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Id.
at 7-8. The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object
to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo
review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the
District Court. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no
objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. PlaintifTs
statement of errors is OVERRULED, and the Commissioner's finding is
AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment for the Commissioner and terminate
this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case No. 2:17-cv-865
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?