Holland v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

ORDER adopting 23 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 12/7/18. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KImberly Holland, Parent on behalf of child, M.D.H., Plaintiff, V. Case No. 2:17-cv-865 Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Vascura Defendant. ORDER On November 20,2018, United States Magistrate Judge Vascura, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division of Columbus, filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Kimberiy Holland's ("Piaintiff") Complaint, on behalf of her minor child, M.D.H., in this Social Security case. The R&R recommended overruling PiaintifTs statement of errors and affirming the Commissioner's decision. R&R 1, ECF No. 23. The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Id. at 7-8. The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. PlaintifTs statement of errors is OVERRULED, and the Commissioner's finding is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment for the Commissioner and terminate this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case No. 2:17-cv-865 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?