Rhoades v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
OPINION and ORDER granting 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. The Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of $5,207.00. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 6/18/20. (sem)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
HEIDI KAY RHOADES,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Case No. 2:17-cv-1078
CHIEF JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY
Magistrate Judge Jolson
Defendant.
OPINION & ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Attorney’s Fees
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act (“SSA”). (ECF No. 15). Plaintiff’s
counsel, attorney Clifford M. Farrell, requests attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,207.00 from
the past-due benefits owed to Plaintiff. The Commissioner does not oppose the amended request
for attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 16).
I.
Background
Plaintiff filed the complaint requesting judicial review from this Court on December 13,
2017. (ECF No. 3). Both parties filed a Joint Motion for Remand on May 23, 2018. (ECF No.
9). On May 24, 2018, this Court remanded this case for further proceeding pursuant to sentence
four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (ECF No. 10). Following remand, Plaintiff was awarded $52,828 in
past due SSI benefits. (ECF No. 15-2 at 2). Upon Plaintiff’s Motion, this Court granted the
award of attorney fees in the amount of $3,500 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act
(“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, however, the $3,500 was seized due to a debt Plaintiff owed to the
Government. (ECF Nos. 13, 15).
1
II.
Law & Analysis
Attorney’s fees can be sought under EAJA and SSA but an attorney who receives
attorney fees under both acts must refund the lesser award to the claimant. Lowery v. Comm’r. of
Soc. Sec., 940 F. Supp. 2d 689, 691 (S.D. Ohio 2013). In this case, Plaintiff’s counsel never
received the EAJA fee and now seeks the sole award of attorney’s fees under the Social Security
Act, therefore, if any fees are awarded under the SSA a refund to the claimant would not be
necessary.
Title 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) states that the court may award attorney’s fees when a claimant
receives a favorable judgement so long as the fee is reasonable and does not exceed 25 percent of
the claimants entitled past-due benefits. 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A). The successful claimant’s
attorney must show that the fee sought is reasonable. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807
(2002). Where there is a contingency fee contract between attorney and client, the court should
give deference to the agreement. However, if the court chooses to deduct from the agreement, it
should record the reasons the deductions were made. Rodriquez v. Bowen, 865 F.2d 739, 746
(6th Cir. 1989). Typically, deductions are made by the court when (1) attorney was involved in
improper conduct or was ineffective counsel; and (2) counsel would enjoy a windfall from a
large reward of benefit which received minimal effort. Id.
Here, Plaintiff’s counsel and Plaintiff have a contingency fee agreement which states that
the attorney fee will be 25 percent of Plaintiff’s past-due benefits. (ECF No. 15-3). Counsel
requests $5,207.00 in attorney fees which is 9.86 percent of Plaintiff’s past-due benefits. The
requested attorney fees are reasonable because the requested amount is well below the 25 percent
maximum, thus, the fee would not be considered a windfall. Lowery, 940 F. Supp. 2d at 692
2
(S.D. Ohio 2013). Furthermore, there is no evidence or allegation of inadequate attorney conduct
or ineffective counsel which would cause the court to reduce the requested fee.
For these reasons, this Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees.
The Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the
amount of $5,207.00.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________________________________
_ __
_
__
_ __
_________________________________________
ALGENON MARBLEY
ALGENON L. MARBLEY
NO
ON
LEY
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED
UNITED STATES
DATE: June 18, 2020
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?