Casarez v. Producers Service Corporation
Filing
11
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 3/28/2018. (ew)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO,
EASTERN DIVISION
JESUS CASAREZ,
CASE NO.: 2:17-CV-1086
PLAINTIFF,
CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
V.
PRODUCERS SERVICE CORP.,
MAGISTRATE JUDGE KIMBERLY A.
JOLSON
DEFENDANT.
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER
WHEREAS, certain documents, materials, discovery responses, testimony, admissions,
data, and other materials and their contents, which may be requested through the abovecaptioned case (hereafter "the Lawsuit”) may contain confidential and proprietary information,
including without limitation client or customer lists and information, confidential compensation
information, confidential financial and business information, as well as other confidential
information.
It is hereby ORDERED that the following terms and conditions shall govern the
disclosure and use of confidential information in this Lawsuit.
1.
To preserve the legitimate proprietary and privacy interests of sources of
information, this Order establishes a procedure for disclosing Confidential Information (defined
in Paragraph 2 below) to the parties in this Lawsuit, imposes obligations on persons receiving
Confidential Information to protect it from unauthorized use or disclosure, and establishes a
procedure for challenging confidentiality designations. This Order applies only to information
furnished by parties and non-parties that is not otherwise publicly available and properly
designated under this Order.
2.
This Order covers information that the producing or disclosing party or nonparty
(hereinafter “source”) designates in good faith as “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only”
(collectively, referred to as “Confidential Information”). The parties to this Agreement further
agree that they will use “Confidential Information” material or information solely for the
purposes of facilitating the prosecution or defense of this Lawsuit and not for any business or
other purpose.
3.
The designation “Confidential” shall be limited to information that the source
reasonably and in good faith believes is of a proprietary or commercially sensitive nature, or
should otherwise be subject to confidential treatment. The designation “Confidential” shall also
include information the source reasonably and in good faith believes is subject to protection
under the confidentiality provisions of any state or federal act, law, or statute. All materials
produced in this Lawsuit containing the designation “Confidential” shall be used solely for the
purposes of this Lawsuit and shall be returned to the source or destroyed at the end of this
Lawsuit.
4.
The designation “Attorney’s Eyes Only” shall be limited to information that the
source reasonably and in good faith believes (a) to contain highly sensitive trade secrets and
proprietary information of the highest level of sensitivity, and (b) to carry a substantial likelihood
of competitive damage if it were disclosed to any other person or entity.
5.
To designate information as “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only,” a source
must so mark it or, in the case of a deposition or hearing transcript, designate it as provided in
paragraphs 11 and 12 herein, respectively. Either designation may be withdrawn by the source.
The source must mark each page of each document and/or each significant component of any
other object containing Confidential Information with the appropriate designation as required. A
2
cover letter can be used, if appropriate, to designate material provided in a computerized format
as “Confidential Information.”
6.
Accidental disclosure of Confidential Information without a designation does not
alone waive the confidence and protections provided under this Order. Upon a source’s
discovery that information was not correctly designated, the source shall provide notice to the
parties or other party that the information was inappropriately designated or inadvertently not
designated. The party to whom the inadvertent disclosure was made shall then immediately
return such material and all copies the party made thereof. Also, in the event any party hereto
receives any document from another party or third-party that upon its face is subject to the
attorney-client privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other privilege, that party shall
immediately notify the producing party or third-party and return such document and all copies
the party made thereof if so requested by the party or third-party who produced the document.
The source shall then have seven business days in which to redesignate the information after
which the terms of this Order shall apply. In the interim, the information may not be used in a
manner inconsistent with the notice.
7.
Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 9, information designated as
“Confidential” may be disclosed to and used only by:
a.
Counsel of record for the parties and such counsel’s support staff involved
in this Lawsuit;
b.
In-house counsel and support staff to the parties involved in this Lawsuit;
c.
Any party to this Lawsuit, or present or former employee of such party to
whom it is necessary to show the information to for purposes of this
Lawsuit;
3
d.
An outside consultant or expert who is being consulted or retained by
counsel in this Lawsuit, including such consultant’s or expert’s support
staff;
e.
The author of the information and anyone shown by the information to have
previously received it in the ordinary course of business;
f.
Any person whose name is contained in the information and to whom it is
necessary to show the information to for purposes of this Lawsuit;
g.
Clerical or ministerial service providers, including outside copying services
and court reporters, retained by a party’s counsel to assist such counsel in
connection with this Lawsuit;
h.
The Court and its support staff; and
i.
Others specifically identified and authorized in writing by the disclosing
party, or as ordered by the court.
8.
Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 9, information designated as “Attorney’s
Eyes Only” may only be disclosed to and used by the persons identified in Paragraph 7 (a), (b),
(d), (e), (g), (h) and (i) above.
9.
Counsel for the respective parties shall be responsible for obtaining, prior to
disclosure and as a condition thereof, the written agreement of any person to whom any
Confidential Information is disclosed (other than the Court, outside counsel for a party, and their
respective staff) to be bound by the terms of this Order. Such written agreement shall be in the
form annexed hereto as Attachment A.
10.
Subject to the terms of this Order, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any
party may use Confidential Information in the course of a deposition or hearing as may be
4
allowed, provided that prior to his or her examination, the witness is furnished with a copy of
this Order and has executed Attachment A to this Order.
11.
Deposition transcripts shall presumptively be considered to have been designated
“Confidential” for a period of fourteen (14) days following receipt of the transcript by the
parties. During that time period, upon further review of the transcript, the deponent, his counsel,
or any party may designate all or portions of the transcript as “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes
Only,” which designation shall remain in effect for the duration of this Order. If there is no
designation within the fourteen (14) day period, then the deposition transcript shall no longer be
considered as containing Confidential Information. The deponent, his counsel, or any party
making such a designation must advise counsel of record and the court reporter of the
designation. The court reporter shall mark the face of the transcript appropriately. If any portion
of a videotaped deposition is designated pursuant to this Paragraph, the videocassette or other
videotape or CD-ROM container shall be labeled with the appropriate legend. Nothing in this
paragraph shall prevent a party from making specific designations on the record during the
deposition, and the court reporter shall mark the face of the transcript appropriately in that event.
Counsel retaining court reporters shall have the responsibility of informing them of these
requirements.
12.
To the extent that any pleadings or documents to be filed with the Court contain
or reference Confidential Information, the party filing said pleadings or documents shall file a
Motion with the court pursuant to Local Rule 5.2.1, requesting authority to file the pleadings or
documents under seal, and requesting that the Clerk of the Court receive and maintain said
pleadings or documents under seal. Leave to file pleadings or documents under seal will be
granted only upon a showing of good cause, and only to the extent reasonably necessary to
5
protect privacy interests. When leave is granted to file pleadings or documents under seal, a
redacted version of the document will be filed on the public record, when practicable. The use of
Confidential Information in hearings or at trial shall be subject to the following:
a.
The party may refer to Confidential Information in preliminary hearings and
conferences before the Court. The source must designate the transcripts of
such proceedings as “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only” within seven
(7) days of receipt.
b.
The use of Confidential Information at trial and in post-trial proceedings,
motions, and appeals may be addressed in a final pretrial order, except that
the words “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only” shall be removed by
the offering party from documents before such documents are used at trial.
The removal of those words shall not affect the protections afforded to the
Confidential Information itself.
13.
This Order may be applied equally to information obtained by or produced in
response to any subpoena, including, in particular, information produced by non-parties. Any
non-party that designates any information as “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only” pursuant
to this Order may agree to submit to the Court’s jurisdiction with regards to the determination of
any disputes involving such designation.
14.
All material produced or furnished in this Lawsuit (including but not limited to
material not marked Confidential or Attorney’s Eyes Only) including documents, deposition
transcripts, and deposition videos shall be used only in connection with this Lawsuit and shall
not be otherwise disclosed except as agreed to by the parties, as required by any court, judicial
tribunal, administrative agency, taxing body or other governmental unit or entity, or as otherwise
6
required by law. All material, including deposition transcripts or videos, produced or furnished in
this Lawsuit shall not be used or disclosed for any business, commercial or competitive purpose
and, furthermore, shall not be used in connection with the media or in connection with materials
for public dissemination of any kind or type, including but not limited to dissemination of such
material to the public via the internet, social media or any other means now or hereafter known.
15.
The following procedures shall govern any challenges to confidentiality
designations:
a.
If a party reasonably believes that information should not be designated as
“Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only,” it must specify to the source in
writing (a) the information in issue, and (b) its grounds for questioning the
confidentiality designation. The parties agree that prior to any challenge
they will telephonically confer or meet in person in good faith. The source
must respond in writing within ten (10) business days of the date of written
notice, or within such additional time as is reasonable (taking into account
the number of documents or other information in issue) and as is agreed to
by counsel or ordered by the Court; and
b.
If the party challenging the confidentiality designation is still not satisfied, it
may move the Court to change the confidentiality designation. Until the
Court rules on a motion challenging a confidentiality designation, the
challenged confidentiality designation shall remain in effect.
c.
The party claiming confidentiality will have the burden of proving that the
challenged confidentiality designation is appropriate in the circumstances.
7
16.
Nothing in this Order shall prevent a party from using or disclosing its own
Confidential Information as it deems appropriate.
17.
This Order shall survive the termination of this proceeding. Within sixty (60) days
after the final resolution of this proceeding, parties in possession of “Confidential” or
“Attorney’s Eyes Only” information produced by other sources shall either destroy or return to
counsel for the source that produced it, at their request and expense, all such information. As for
those materials that contain or reflect “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only” information, but
also constitute or reflect counsel’s work product, counsel of record for the parties shall be
entitled to retain such work product in their files in accordance with the provisions of this Order,
so long as it is clearly marked to reflect that it contains information subject to this Order, and so
long as counsel shall take all other reasonable steps to ensure that such documents are securely
maintained. Counsel shall be entitled to retain pleadings, deposition transcripts, and the hearing
record (including exhibits) even if materials contain “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only”
materials so long as such information is marked to reflect that it contains information subject to
this Order, and so long as counsel shall take all other reasonable steps to ensure that such
documents are securely maintained.
18.
Any non-party that receives a subpoena for production or disclosure of
information that they believe in good faith may be designated “Confidential” or “Attorney’s
Eyes Only” shall assert objections as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
19.
The parties agree that if they receive a subpoena or other request for the
production of documents from a non-party that may require the production of documents
designated as “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only,” the party receiving the subpoena or
request shall promptly give written notice to the source and to the parties identifying the
8
information sought and enclosing a copy of the subpoena. The person or party subject to the
subpoena shall not produce or disclose the requested information without consent of the source
or until ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction.
20.
Nothing in this Order shall bar or otherwise restrict any attorney from rendering
advice to his or her client with respect to this proceeding and, in the course of rendering advice,
referring to or relying generally on the examination of material designated “Confidential” or
“Attorney’s Eyes Only.”
21.
The parties recognize that during the course of discovery, certain discovery
requests may require the production of or “Attorney’s Eyes Only” information (including, but
not limited to, business strategies) which either party may, in good faith, believe requires
protections in addition to those provided for documents designated as “Attorney’s Eyes Only.”
As a result, the parties reserve the right to seek modification of this Order to address any such
potential issues. To the extent such a modification of this Stipulation and Protective Order is
requested, the moving party will have the burden of demonstrating “good cause” for any such
protections.
22.
If “Confidential” or “Attorney’s Eyes Only” materials are inadvertently disclosed
to any person other than in the manner authorized by this Order, the person responsible for the
disclosure must immediately bring all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure to the attention
of counsel for the producing party and, without prejudice to any other rights and remedies of the
parties, make every effort to prevent further disclosure by it or by the person who was the
9
recipient of such information.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: March 28, 2018
/s/ Kimberly A. Jolson
KIMBERLY A. JOLSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
STIPULATED AND APPROVED:
/s/ Jason H. Beehler
Brendan P. Feheley (0079107)
Jason H. Beehler (0085337)
Kegler Brown Hill + Ritter Co., LPA
65 East State Street, Suite 1800
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Phone: (614) 462-5400
Fax: (614) 464-2634
bfeheley@keglerbrown.com
jbeehler@keglerbrown.com
Attorneys for Defendant
/s/ Robi J. Baishnab, per authorization JHB
Robert E. DeRose (0055214)
Robi J. Baishnab (0086195)
250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
T: (614) 221-4221
F: (614) 744-2300
bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
Local Counsel for Plaintiff
Chris Burks (pro hac vice pending)
Sean Short (pro hac vice pending)
Sanford Law Firm, PLLC
One Financial Center
650 S. Shackleford Road, Suite 411
Little Rock, AR 72211
T: (501) 221-0088
F: (888) 787-2040
josh@sandfordlawfirm.com
sean@sandfordlawfirm.com
Attorneys in Charge for Plaintiffs
10
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that I have read and understand the foregoing Stipulated Confidentiality
and Protective Order regarding certain documents and information produced in discovery in Case
No. 2:17-cv-1086, Casarez v. Producers Service Corp. I agree to abide by the terms and
conditions of that Protective Order. I also understand that any violation of said Protective Order
by me or anyone acting under my direction may subject me to penalties for contempt of court.
Dated: _____________
____________________________
Signature
____________________________
Address
____________________________
11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?