Al'Shahid v. Mohr et al
Filing
51
OPINION and ORDER adopting 50 the Report and Recommendation; denying 27 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 2/21/2020. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Curtis Al'Shahld,
Case No. 2:18-cv-33
Plaintiff,
Judge Michael H. Watson
V.
Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers
Stuart Hudson, et al.,
Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
On January 29, 2020, Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers issued an Order and
Report and Recommendation ("R&R") denying Plaintiffs motion to strike, denying
Plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and recommending that
Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be denied. R&R, EOF No. 50.
Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers notified the parties of their right to file objections
to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Id. at 13. She also specifically advised
the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a
waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal
the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id.
The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. Plaintiffs motion for summary
judgment, ECF No. 27, is DENIED in accordance with the R&R.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Isl Michael H. Watson
MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?