Jefferson County, Ohio v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al

Filing 22

ORDER granting #13 Motion to Stay the date by which to respond to the Complaint. The Manufacturer Defendants shall have sixty (60) days after the final determination of removal to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on March 7, 2018. (jlk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON,
CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00037-EAS-EPD

Plaintiff,

Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.
vs.

Chief Magistrate Judge
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., etal.

Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

Defendants.

ORDER

For good cause shown, the unopposed motion of Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma
Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Cephalon, Inc.,
Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Endo Phannaceuticals Inc., Allergan pic, Allergan Finance, LLC

f/k/a Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson
Pharma, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., and Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (collectively,
"Manufacturer Defendants") to stay the date by which to respond to the Complaint (ECF No, 13)
is GRANTED. The Manufacturer Defendants shall have sixty (60) days after the final
determination of removal to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED^ATB^ MAGISTRAtE JUDGt
Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers