Jefferson County, Ohio v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al

Filing 22

ORDER granting 13 Motion to Stay the date by which to respond to the Complaint. The Manufacturer Defendants shall have sixty (60) days after the final determination of removal to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on March 7, 2018. (jlk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00037-EAS-EPD Plaintiff, Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. vs. Chief Magistrate Judge PURDUE PHARMA L.P., etal. Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers Defendants. ORDER For good cause shown, the unopposed motion of Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Endo Phannaceuticals Inc., Allergan pic, Allergan Finance, LLC f/k/a Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., and Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (collectively, "Manufacturer Defendants") to stay the date by which to respond to the Complaint (ECF No, 13) is GRANTED. The Manufacturer Defendants shall have sixty (60) days after the final determination of removal to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED^ATB^ MAGISTRAtE JUDGt Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?