Heid et al v. Mohr et al

Filing 74

ORDER denying 73 Motion Return Confiscated Property. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on June 10, 2019. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RAY SCOTT HEID, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action 2:18-cv-00311 Judge Algenon L. Marbley Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers v. GARY MOHR, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff Damron’s Request for the Court to Order Defendants Return the Legal Property Unjustly Confiscated from Plaintiff Ray Scott Heid. (ECF No. 73.) Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name—or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Here, Plaintiff Damron has filed the instant Motion on behalf of Plaintiff Heid, requesting that Plaintiff Heid’s property be returned to him and/or that legal counsel be appointed for Plaintiff Heid. (ECF No. 73.) Because Plaintiff Damron is not a class representative or a lawyer, any pleadings, motions, or other papers he signs on behalf of other inmates are not properly before the Court. Accordingly, the Motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: June 10, 2019 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers_________ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?