Grissom et al v. Antero Resources Corporation
ORDER APPROVING REVISED CLASS NOTICE. Signed by Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 11/21/2022. (cmw)
Case: 2:20-cv-02028-EAS-EPD Doc #: 76 Filed: 11/21/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1853
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
THE GRISSOMS, LLC,
Case No. 2:20-CV-2028-EAS-EPD
JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION,
ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS
ORDER APPROVING REVISED CLASS NOTICE
This matter is before the Court on the Second Joint Motion to Approve Revised Class
Notice. (ECF No. 75.) On October 31, 2022, the Court granted Elaine Grissom, Torjimar, Inc.,
and The Grissoms, LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Approve Notice Plan. (ECF No. 68.)
Thereafter, the Court granted a joint motion by Plaintiff The Grissoms, LLC and Defendant Antero
Resources Corporation (“Antero”) to revise the approved notice to remove references in the notice
to Elaine Grissom, who had voluntarily dismissed her claims against Antero. (ECF No. 73.) The
Court thereafter entered an Order Setting Trial Date and Settlement Conference, (ECF No. 74),
which rendered inaccurate a statement in the approved notice that “[t]he trial has not yet been
To ensure that the Class Notice contains accurate and up-to-date information, Plaintiff The
Grissoms, LLC and Antero have agreed to a revision to the approved class notice inserting the new
trial date in this matter. Upon consideration thereof, the Court GRANTS the subject motion (ECF
No. 75), APPROVES the proposed revision to the class notice, and further ORDERS that such
Case: 2:20-cv-02028-EAS-EPD Doc #: 76 Filed: 11/21/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1854
class notice shall be mailed by the Notice Administrator, Epperly Re:Solutions, within 10 days of
entry of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED
s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?