Millhouse, II v. Seleshi et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 8 and DENIES Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk is ORDERED to mail Plaintiff a copy of the Court's Pro Se Manual. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 1/10/2022. (tb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Case: 2:21-cv-05210-SDM-EPD Doc #: 12 Filed: 01/10/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 127 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Justin Millhouse, II, aka Alexis Millhouse, Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:21-cv-5210 -vsDr. Ermias Seleshi, et al., Defendants. Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Preston Deavers : ORDER This matter is before the Court upon consideration of a Report and Recommendation (R&R) issued by the Magistrate Judge on December 9, 2021. (ECF No. 8). In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Motion for Default Judgment of Plaintiff Justin Millhouse, II, aka Alexis Millhouse 1 (ECF No. 7) be denied under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1997e(g)(1) and e(g)(2) and for failure to obtain service and to comport with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Plaintiff’s December 14, 2021 Response (ECF No. 9) is not an objection but rather a request for instruction on how to obtain service on the Defendants. The Court cannot provide legal advice; however, the Clerk is ORDERED to mail Plaintiff a copy of the Court’s Pro Se Manual. Plaintiff filed for a gender marker change in December 2021 and asks that the Court use a female pronoun when referring to her. (ECF No. 9.) The Court will honor that request. 1 1 Case: 2:21-cv-05210-SDM-EPD Doc #: 12 Filed: 01/10/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 128 For the reasons set forth in the R&R, and without objection, the Court hereby ADOPTS the R&R (ECF No. 8) and DENIES the Motion for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 7.) IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?