Mills v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

ORDER granting the parties Joint 13 Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/2/2022. (art)

Download PDF
Case: 2:22-cv-01695-KLL Doc #: 14 Filed: 08/02/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 2373 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JEFFREY M., 1 Plaintiff, Case Number: 2:22-cv-1695 Litkovitz, M.J. vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion to remand this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. (Doc. 13). Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, this matter shall be remanded back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision. The Commissioner will develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, hold a new hearing, and issue a new decision. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the parties’ joint motion to remand (Doc. 13) is GRANTED; this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further Pursuant to General Order 22-01, due to significant privacy concerns in social security cases, any opinion, order, judgment or other disposition in social security cases in the Southern District of Ohio shall refer to plaintiffs only by their first names and last initials. 1 Case: 2:22-cv-01695-KLL Doc #: 14 Filed: 08/02/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 2374 administrative proceedings; and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. 8/2/2022 Date:_____________ __________________________ Karen L. Litkovitz United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?