Mills v. Commissioner of Social Security
ORDER granting the parties Joint 13 Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/2/2022. (art)
Case: 2:22-cv-01695-KLL Doc #: 14 Filed: 08/02/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 2373
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
JEFFREY M., 1
Case Number: 2:22-cv-1695
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion to remand this case for further
administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to enter
judgment in favor of plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. (Doc. 13).
Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, this matter shall be remanded back to the
Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205
of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate
all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision. The Commissioner will develop the
administrative record as necessary to determine whether plaintiff is disabled within the meaning
of the Social Security Act, hold a new hearing, and issue a new decision.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the parties’ joint motion to remand (Doc. 13)
is GRANTED; this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further
Pursuant to General Order 22-01, due to significant privacy concerns in social security cases, any opinion, order,
judgment or other disposition in social security cases in the Southern District of Ohio shall refer to plaintiffs only by
their first names and last initials.
Case: 2:22-cv-01695-KLL Doc #: 14 Filed: 08/02/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 2374
administrative proceedings; and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment
as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
Karen L. Litkovitz
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?