Mays v. Sitot

Filing 6

OPINION and ORDER adopting #5 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/16/2022. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Case: 2:22-cv-03035-MHW-EPD Doc #: 6 Filed: 09/16/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Tavon M. Mays, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:22-cv-3035 V. Judge Michael H. Watson RItbey Sitot, et al., Magistrate Judge Deavers Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Magistrate Judge Deavers performed an initial screen of this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C.ยง 1915(e)(2). She issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R")recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint without prejudice. R&R, ECF No. 5. The R&R notified the parties of their right to object to the recommendation contained therein and advised the parties that a failure to timely object would result in a forfeiture of the right to de novo review by the Undersigned as well as of the right to appeal an adoption of the R&R. Id. at 6. Plaintiff failed to timely object to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the same and DISMISSES Plaintiffs Amended Complaint without prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL H. WAtSON,JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?