Mays v. Sitot

Filing 6

OPINION and ORDER adopting #5 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/16/2022. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Case: 2:22-cv-03035-MHW-EPD Doc #: 6 Filed: 09/16/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 30

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

Tavon M. Mays,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:22-cv-3035

V.

Judge Michael H. Watson

RItbey Sitot, et al.,

Magistrate Judge Deavers

Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

Magistrate Judge Deavers performed an initial screen of this case
pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2). She issued a Report and Recommendation

("R&R")recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint
without prejudice. R&R, ECF No. 5. The R&R notified the parties of their right to
object to the recommendation contained therein and advised the parties that a

failure to timely object would result in a forfeiture of the right to de novo review by
the Undersigned as well as of the right to appeal an adoption of the R&R. Id. at
6.

Plaintiff failed to timely object to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS

the same and DISMISSES Plaintiffs Amended Complaint without prejudice. The
Clerk shall terminate this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. WAtSON,JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT