Givens v. Shadyside Police Department et al

Filing 14

ORDER: The 10 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Mr. Givens is ORDERED to pay the $402 filing fees ($350 filing fee plus $52 administrative fee) within thirty days to proceed. The Court ADVISES Mr. Givens that if he d oes not pay the filing fees in full within thirty days, his case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. The Court further CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 6/7/2023. (merc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Case: 2:22-cv-04268-SDM-CMV Doc #: 14 Filed: 06/07/23 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 124 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GREG GIVENS, Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:22-cv-04268 Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura v. SHADYSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., : Defendants. ORDER On April 26, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff Greg Givens’s first, second, and third motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 1, 3, 8) be denied. (R&R, ECF No. 10.) The R&R inadvertently omitted the deadline for filing objections, so the Magistrate Judge issued an order on May 19, 2023, setting forth the procedure and advising Mr. Givens that he had 14 days from the date of the May 19 order to file and serve any written objections. (ECF No. 12.) Mr. Givens timely filed an Objection. (ECF No. 13.) If a party objects within the allotted time to a report and recommendation, the Court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Upon review, the Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Case: 2:22-cv-04268-SDM-CMV Doc #: 14 Filed: 06/07/23 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 125 In his Objection, Mr. Givens states that prior courts have allowed him to proceed in forma pauperis and his “circumstances have not changed.” (ECF No. 13.) He provides no case names or numbers. (Id.) The Court has reviewed the record and analyzed the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, and finds the R&R well-reasoned. The Magistrate Judge gave Mr. Givens three separate opportunities to answer straightforward questions about how much money he received from sources during the preceding twelve months, but his answers conflicted with one another and other court filings, and evolved. (R&R, PageID 114–15.) Mr. Givens’s Objection fails to explain these contradictions and inconsistencies and is OVERRULED. (ECF No. 13.) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. (ECF No. 10.) For the reasons set forth in it, the motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 1, 3, 8) are DENIED. Mr. Givens is ORDERED to pay the $402 filing fees ($350 filing fee plus $52 administrative fee) within thirty days to proceed. The Court ADVISES Mr. Givens that if he does not pay the filing fees in full within thirty days, his case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. The Court further CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?