Foltz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

ORDER granting 19 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Algenon L Marbley on 11/25/2024. (cw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SAMANTHA F., Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 2:23-cv-2480 JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHELSEY M. VASCURA ORDER This matter is before this Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (ECF No. 19). The parties have stipulated to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees in the amount of $6,100.00, under the EAJA. (Id. at 1). This award satisfies all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs, and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Id.). Further, Defendant agrees to direct the award to Plaintiff’s attorney if counsel for the parties can verify that Plaintiff owes no preexisting debt subject to offset. (Id.). For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown, the parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney Fees Under the EAJA is GRANTED. (ECF No. 19). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees in the amount of $6,100.00; 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the Equal Access to Justice Act award directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___ ALGENON L. MARBLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: November 25, 2024 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?