Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 12 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 3/12/25. (ds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION : Brittany A. : : Case No. 2:23-cv-04082 Plaintiff, : v. : Judge Graham : Commissioner of the Social : Magistrate Judge Gentry Security Administration, : : Defendant. : ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Gentry (doc. 12) recommending reversal of the Commissioner’s non-disability determination and further recommending that this action be remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommended that, on remand, The ALJ should further develop the record as necessary, particularly as to the medical opinion evidence and Plaintiff’s mental limitations, and evaluate the evidence of record under the applicable legal criteria mandated by the Commissioner’s regulations and rulings and governing case law. The ALJ should evaluate Plaintiff’s disability claim under the required five-step sequential analysis to determine anew whether Plaintiff was under a disability and whether [her] application for SSI should be granted. Doc. 12, # 1840. No objections to the R&R have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has expired. The Court ADOPTS the R&R (doc. 12) and ORDERS that the Commissioner’s nondisability determination be REVERSED, and this matter REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the recommendations adopted herein. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ James L. Graham JAMES L. GRAHAM United States District Judge DATE: March 12, 2025

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?