Johnson v. United Nations and Member Status et al

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 5/9/2024. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SHERECA JOHNSON, : : Plaintiff, : v. : : THE UNITED NATIONS AND ITS : MEMBER STATES, et al., : : Defendants. : Case No. 2:24-cv-781 Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura ORDER Plaintiff, Shereca Johnson, an Ohio resident proceeding without the assistance of counsel, filed a seven-sentence Complaint in which she identifies herself as “the most high God the creator of the heavens and the earth” and as “the commander and chief and absolute monarchy.” (ECF No. 1-1 at 4). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that her Complaint be dismissed for “fail[ing] to meet the facial plausibility standard such that it is legally frivolous,” as its sole allegation is that Defendants—the United Nations and its Member States, the Vatican and Vatican City, and the United States of America—are “are anarchist operating without a chief” and “neglect[ing] the most high God over and over again.” (ECF No. 3 at 3–4 (quoting ECF No. 1-1 at 4)). Plaintiff was advised of her right to object to the R&R within fourteen days and of the rights she would waive by failing to do so. (Id. at 4–5). This Court has reviewed the R&R. No objections have been filed, and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Finding the R&R to be correct in fact and law, this Court hereby ADOPTS the R&R (ECF No. 3). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 9, 2024 ALGENON L. MARBLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?