Cummings et al v. State Of Ohio

Filing 5

ORDER granting #4 Plaintiff Clifford Cummings's Request for Authorization to Access E-Filing as Pro Se Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 10/24/24. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CLIFFORD CUMMINGS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF OHIO, et al., Civil Action 2:24-cv-4041 Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Jolson Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Clifford Cummings’s Request for Authorization to Access E-Filing as Pro Se Plaintiff. (Doc. 4). The “grant of electronic filing privileges is a privilege granted to pro se litigants in the discretion of this Court.” Needham v. Butler Cnty. Jail, No. 1:19-cv-294, 2019 WL 5883643, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2019). For good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Clifford Cummings is granted permission to participate in electronic case filing in this matter. He is also advised that the Court may, in its discretion, revoke or restrict his electronic filing privileges at any time should he abuse this privilege or fail to comply with the Local Rules. On a final note, only Plaintiff Clifford Cummings requests e-filing privileges. Plaintiff Abigail Cummings does not. (See Doc. 4). As such, Plaintiff Clifford Cummings is cautioned that “a nonlawyer can’t handle a case on behalf of anyone except himself.” Zanecki v. Health Alliance Plan of Detroit, 576 F. App’x 594, 595 (6th Cir. 2014); see also Gonzales v. Wyatt, 157 F.3d 1016, 1021 (5th Cir. 1998) (“[W]here the document is tendered and signed by a nonlawyer on behalf of another, then there comes into play the underlying principle itself, namely that in federal court a party can represent himself or be represented by an attorney, but cannot be represented by a nonlawyer.”). Put simply, the Court warns Clifford Cummings that he may not file documents on behalf of Abigail Cummings. See Jordan v. City of Toledo, No. 3:21-cv-1233, 2022 WL 1500470, at *5 (N.D. Ohio May 12, 2022) (stating that an individual cannot “properly file motions” on behalf of another); Martin v. Fennville Pub. Sch. Dist., No. 1:21-cv-202, 2021 WL 5579204, at *2 (W.D. Mich. May 4, 2021) (denying a motion filed on behalf of another pro se plaintiff). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: October 24, 2024 /s/ Kimberly A. Jolson KIMBERLY A. JOLSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?