Su v. DRR Roofing, LLC et al
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING THE 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondents be held in contempt and that a fine of $100 PER DAY be imposed on them until they comply with the Court's order of 7/15/2024. It is further ORDERED that Respondents pay the attorney's fees and costs Petitioner reasonably incurred in connection with prosecuting the petition. Signed by Chief District Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 11/25/2024. (merc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary,
Department of Labor,
:
Petitioner,
Case No. 2:24-mc-19
Judge Sarah D. Morrison
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M.
Vascura
v.
DRR ROOFING, LLC, et al.,
:
Respondents.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the October 21, 2024, Report and
Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 14.) Petitioner, Julie A.
Su, Acting Secretary of the Department of Labor, commenced this miscellaneous
action by petition to enforce an administrative subpoena served on Respondents,
DRR Roofing, LLC, and Daniel Ruiz. (ECF No. 1.)
The subpoena required production of specified records and documents by
October 20, 2023. (Subpoena Duces Tecum, ECF No. 1–8.) Respondents failed to
respond, and the Acting Secretary filed a Petition to Enforce Subpoena Duces
Tecum on May 24, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) The Court granted the petition on July 15,
2024, and ordered Respondents to produce the documents identified within the
subpoena within thirty days. (ECF No. 6.) The Respondents again failed to respond.
The Acting Secretary filed a motion for an order to require Respondents to show
cause why they should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the order
enforcing the subpoena. (ECF No. 10.) The Court granted the motion and held a
Show Cause hearing at which Respondents failed to appear. (ECF Nos. 11, 12.)
In response to the Acting Secretary’s motion for an order to show cause, the
Magistrate Judge recommended that the Respondents be held in contempt, that a
daily coercive fine be imposed, that the statute of limitations be tolled, and that
Petitioner be awarded its attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 14.) It further directed the U.S.
Marshal to effect personal service of the Report and Recommendation on Mr. Ruiz
and directed the Clerk of Court to effect service by U.S. Mail. (Id.) Mr. Ruiz
acknowledged service through U.S. Mail (ECF No. 16), but the U.S. Marshall was
unable effect personal service (ECF No. 17).
The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed.
The Court thus ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation. (ECF
No. 14.) Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondents be held in contempt and
that a fine of $100 PER DAY be imposed on them until they comply with the
Court’s July 15, 2024, order. It is further ORDERED the statute of limitations for
actions under the FLSA against Respondents be tolled from October 20, 2023 (the
date Respondents first failed to comply with the subpoena), until such date as the
Respondents comply in full. It is further ORDERED that Respondents pay the
attorney’s fees and costs Petitioner reasonably incurred in connection with
prosecuting the petition. The Magistrate Judge’s final recommendation—that these
sanctions not be imposed should Respondents respond to the subpoena within
fourteen days of being personally served the Report and Recommendation—is
VACATED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Sarah D. Morrison
SARAH D. MORRISON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?