Franklin v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution

Filing 164

DECISION AND ORDER STRIKING PRO SE MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/30/2014. (kpf1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON ANTONIO SANCHEZ FRANKLIN, Petitioner, : Case No. 3:04-cv-187 - vs Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz NORMAN ROBINSON, Warden, Respondent. : DECISION AND ORDER STRIKING PRO SE MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner’s pro se Motion to Withdraw the reference to the Magistrate Judge as Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § [636](c)(4)’s Extraordinary Circumstances and/or Good Cause Shown (Doc. No. 163). As Petitioner has been repeatedly advised, a party represented by counsel may not file papers pro se. 28 U.S.C. § 1654 provides that “parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel.” The disjunctive “or” in the statute means that a litigant must choose between proceeding pro se and proceeding with the assistance of counsel. United States v. Jimenez-Zalapa, 2007 WL 2815563 (W.D. Tenn. 2007)(Breen, J.); see also United States v. Mosely, 910 F.2d 93, 97-98 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Vampire Nation, 451 F.3d 189 (3rd Cir. 2006). The Motion to Withdraw Reference is accordingly STRICKEN. January 30, 2014. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?