Doyle v. McConagha et al

Filing 23

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. 8 ), ADOPTING CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 5 ) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 10 ) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 2/8/07. (bev1, ) Modified on 2/15/2007 to edit text (sc1, ).

Doyle v. McConagha et al

Doc. 23

Case 3:07-cv-00003-TMR-MRM

Document 23

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
WAYNE DOYLE et al., Plaintiff, -vsCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY, et al. Case No. C-3-07-003 District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Defendants _________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. #8), ADOPTING CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #5) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #10) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
________________________________________________________________________________

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendations (Doc. #5) issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Michael Merz on January 8, 2007. Plaintiff filed Objections (Doc. #8) to said Report and Recommendations on January 10, 2007. In response to said objections, the Chief Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the General Order of Reference for the Dayton location of Court issued a Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. #10) on January 16, 2007, to which no objections were filed. The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Chief Magistrate Judge in both the Report and Recommendations (Doc. #5) and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. #10) as well as Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. #8) filed as to the original Report and Recommendations. The Court has considered these and all filings in this matter de novo. Upon consideration of all the foregoing, the Court does determine that both the Report and Recommendations (Doc. #5) and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. #10) are well-founded and are ADOPTED in their

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-cv-00003-TMR-MRM

Document 23

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 2 of 2

entirety. The Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. #*) to the initial Report and Recommendations (Doc. #5) are OVERRULED. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED pending a hearing on his Motion for preliminary injunction which is to be reset after the Chief Magistrate conducts a preliminary pretrial conference. February 8, 2007
s/THOMAS M. ROSE

_______________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-