Kerr v. Hurd et al

Filing 90

ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD - In order for the Court to decide properly the pending Motion for Expert Fees (Doc. No. 69), it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff file an affidavit from the witness setting forth (1) what his standard hourly fee is and the percentage of his clients or of Brady Ware's clients who are charged that rate; (2) what he actually did during the time he was preparing for the deposition, in detail sufficient to enable to the Court to determine whether that expenditure of time was reasonably necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/28/2009. (kopf1, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
MD ELTON R. KERR, Plaintiff, -vs: MD WILLIAM W. HURD, et al., Defendants. : Case No. 3:07-cv-297 Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD

In order for the Court to decide properly the pending Motion for Expert Fees (Doc. No. 69), it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff file an affidavit from the witness setting forth (1) what his standard hourly fee is and the percentage of his clients or of Brady Ware's clients who are charged that rate; (2) what he actually did during the time he was preparing for the deposition, in detail sufficient to enable to the Court to determine whether that expenditure of time was reasonably necessary. July 28, 2009.
s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge

1