Wells Fargo Bank NA v. LaSalle Bank National Association

Filing 153

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL - Plaintiff's Motion to Compel production of a document referred to as the Property Condition Assessment Guidelines (Doc. No. 66) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/14/2009. (kopf1, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, -vs: LaSALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant. : Case No. 3:07-cv-449 Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel production of a document referred to as the Property Condition Assessment Guidelines (Doc. No. 66). Defendant filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 68). Plain tiff has filed no reply memorandum in support and the time for doing so expired January 2, 2009. In its Response, Defendant asserts that the Property Condition Assessment Guidelines are not responsive to Request No. 1 of Plaintiff's Fifth Request for the Production of Documents. In that the Request Plaintiff called for "All LaSalle manuals, guidebooks, or analogous compilations of documents concerning internal procedures for the underwriting and/or origination of commercial loans that were in effect at the time the Loans were being underwritten and originated." (Quoted at Motion, Doc. No. 66, at 2.) Defendant asserts that these Guidelines did not concern "internal" procedures, but were in fact directed to outside evaluators. In addition, Defendant notes that no witness has testified these Guidelines were in effect at the time the loans in suit were being 1 underwritten and originated. Plaintiff makes no response to these two assertions and the Court therefore accepts them as made. On that basis, the Motion to Compel is not well taken and is therefore DENIED. April 14, 2009. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?