Wells Fargo Bank NA v. LaSalle Bank National Association

Filing 433

DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE - This case is before the Court on LaSalle's Motion In Limine (Doc. No. 401). Wells Fargo has opposed the Motion (Doc. No. 406) and LaSalle has filed a Reply in Support (Doc. No. 409). The Motion is granted insofar as it seeks to preclude Plaintiff from calling to testify at trial Defendant's attorneys Lorianne Fuhrer, Stephanie union, Gregory Markel, Jason Halper, and Lauren U.Y. Lee. All other issues presented by the Motion are reserved for ruling at trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/29/2010. (kpf1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, -vs: LaSALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant. : Case No. 3:07-cv-449 Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE This case is before the Court on LaSalle's Motion In Limine (Doc. No. 401). Wells Fargo has opposed the Motion (Doc. No. 406) and LaSalle has filed a Reply in Support (Doc. No. 409). The Motion is granted insofar as it seeks to preclude Plaintiff from calling to testify at trial Defendant's attorneys Lorianne Fuhrer, Stephanie union, Gregory Markel, Jason Halper, and Lauren U.Y. Lee. All other issues presented by the Motion are reserved for ruling at trial. October 29, 2010. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?