Lloyd v. United States Of America
Filing
62
DECISION AND ENTRY: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on June 3, 2009 (Doc. 70 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Lawrence W. Lloyd's Petition to Vacate Sentence (Doc. 60 ) is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice; 3. A certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. 2253 shall not issue; and 4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6/23/09. (bev1, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. LAWRENCE W. LLOYD,
: : : : Case No. 3:03cr00161 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
Defendant. : _____________________________________ LAWRENCE W. LLOYD, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. : : : : : Case No. 3:08cv007 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
DECISION AND ENTRY
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #70), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that:
1. 2. 3. 4.
The Report and Recommendations filed on June 3, 2009 (Doc. #70) is ADOPTED in full; Lawrence W. Lloyd's Petition to Vacate Sentence (Doc. #60) is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice; A certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. 2253 shall not issue; and This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.
June 23, 2009
*S/THOMAS M. ROSE
Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?