Bays v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary

Filing 110

ORDER REGARDING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY - In order to comply with Rule 11, it is hereby ordered that Petitioner file, not later than the date he files any objections to the pending Report and Recommendations, a motion for certificate of appealability on each claim on which he intends to appeal if District Judge Rose adopts the recommendation as to that ground for relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 02/18/12. (pb1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON RICHARD BAYS, : Petitioner, Case No. 3:08-cv-076 : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz -vsWARDEN, Ohio State Penitentiary, : Respondent. ORDER REGARDING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY It has previously been this Court’s practice to decide the question of appealability after decision on the merits in capital habeas cases. However, Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 cases was amended, effective December 1, 2009, to require that district courts issue or deny a certificate of appealability when they enter a final order adverse to the applicant. The Magistrate Judge has now recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. In order to comply with Rule 11, it is hereby ordered that Petitioner file, not later than the date he files any objections to the pending Report and Recommendations, a motion for certificate of appealability on each claim on which he intends to appeal if District Judge Rose adopts the recommendation as to that ground for relief. February 18, 2012. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?