Slagle v. Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Ohio

Filing 47

ORDER DISSOLVING WRIT OF CERTIORARI - It is accordingly ORDERED that the Writ of Certiorari herein (Doc. No. 19) be, and it hereby is, DISSOLVED. The Clerk of this Court shall promptly scan and file the state court record, entitling the docket entry state court record) and return the original documents in the state court record to the Clerk of Courts of Montgomery County, Ohio. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/5/2009. (kpf1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JOHN W. SLAGLE, : Petitioner, : -vsCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO, : Respondent. Case No. 3:08-cv-146 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz ORDER DISSOLVING WRIT OF CERTIORARI Final judgment in this case was entered September 15, 2009, granting Petitioner a conditional writ of habeas corpus providing that he "shall be discharged from further responding to the Indictment unless the Common Pleas Court renders a decision on the video record already created not later than 180 days from the date judgment is entered in this matter." (Entry and Order, Doc. No. 40, at 1-2.) Petitioner appealed from that decision (Doc. No. 43), but no stay pending appeal has been requested or entered. The Common Pleas Court may therefore have need of its original records in this matter before the case can be heard on appeal by the Sixth Circuit. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Writ of Certiorari herein (Doc. No. 19) be, and it hereby is, DISSOLVED. The Clerk of this Court shall promptly scan and file the state court record, entitling the docket entry "state court record") and return the original documents in the state court record to the Clerk of Courts of Montgomery County, Ohio. December 5, 2009. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?