Gapen v. Bobby

Filing 150

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE - Accordingly, the Court sua sponte extends the Petitioners time to file his Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Petition to and including July 2, 2012. Respondents Motion to Strike is accordingly denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/3/2012. (kf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON LARRY GAPEN, Petitioner, : Case No. 3:08-cv-280 - vs District Judge Walter Herbert Rice Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz DAVID BOBBY, Warden, Respondent. : DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE This case is before the Court on the Warden’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 149) Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Petition (Doc. No. 148). The Court agrees with Respondent’s analysis that Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 does not apply to extend the time for performing an act from Sunday to the following Monday when a court sets Sunday as the specific date. Indeed, the undersigned has on occasion expressly and intentionally set matters for Sunday, often when needed to coerce recalcitrant deponents into being reasonable about their availability. But that is not what happened here. The undersigned chose July 1st simply because it was an upcoming beginning of a month, a convenient date for planning purposes, and not to impose a Sunday-filing deadline. Of course, Petitioner’s counsel were not free to disregard the set date. They could have avoided working on Sunday to comply with it by completing the Motion on Saturday or by asking for a one-day extension. Nevertheless, the intervening time causes no prejudice to the 1 Warden. Accordingly, the Court sua sponte extends the Petitioner’s time to file his Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Petition to and including July 2, 2012. Respondent’s Motion to Strike is accordingly denied. July 3, 2012. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?