Gapen v. Bobby
Filing 167
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - According, the Warden's Motion to Dismiss on the basis that Grounds Twenty-Four and Twenty-Five are not cognizable in habeas corpus is DENIED on the authority of Adams v. Bradshaw, supra. The Warden's procedural default defense to Ground 25 is DENIED without prejudice as premature. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 09/13/12. (pb1)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
