Martin v. Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC et al
Filing
158
ORDER FOLLOWING INFORMAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 12/5/2012. (JurM)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
IN RE: BEHR DAYTON
THERMAL PRODUCTS, LLC
:
:
:
:
Case No. 3:08-cv-326
District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
ORDER FOLLOWING INFORMAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE
This matter is before the Court on a discovery dispute between the parties regarding
forthcoming depositions during the class certification discovery period. On December 5, 2012,
the Court held a telephonic status conference involving counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendants.
Having heard arguments from both sides, and having fully considered the parties’ respective
positions, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
1) The Court finds Plaintiffs have shown good cause to extend the 10 deposition limitation
set forth in the Discovery Protocol (doc. 137-1 at PageID 1912) adopted by Judge Rice
on May 14, 2012 (doc. 138). In the interest of justice, the Court finds that Defendants
shall likewise be permitted to exceed 10 depositions if necessary. Rather than impose a
specific number of depositions in excess of 10, the Court finds that the better course is to
refer this issue back to the parties to continue to work together to determine the number
of depositions, whom shall be deposed, and when such depositions shall take place;
2) The Court believes that, in an unusual circumstance, the need for a deposition to exceed 7
hours may occur. For instance, if an individual is noticed for a deposition in his or her
individual capacity and as a 30(b)(6) witness, the Court would anticipate such a
deposition to exceed 7 hours.
The Court expects the parties to work together to
determine and agree upon how much additional time is necessary for such a deponent.
Depositions are not expected to last more than one day without prior Court approval or
agreement amongst the parties;
3) The cut-off deadline for non-expert class certification discovery, currently set for January
4, 2013 (see doc. 135 at PageID 1896), remains in effect. This deadline, however, is
extended 21 days, until January 25, 2013, with regard to non-expert depositions
concerning class certification. All other dates set forth in the Case Management Order
remain unchanged; and
4) The Court expects counsel for all sides to act in good faith in their efforts to resolve any
remaining discovery disputes through the cut-off dates.
In the event the parties’
extrajudicial efforts to resolve other discovery disputes are unsuccessful, the Court
remains available by telephone to set discovery conferences as needed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 5, 2012
s/Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?