Martin v. Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC et al

Filing 173

ORDER - Pursuant to the oral agreement of counsel, the Court hereby ORDERS the following briefing schedule: 1. Counsel for Plaintiffs shall file a copy of the transcript from the deposition of Mr. Nodel by February 8, 2013; 2. Plaintiffs' memor andum in response to this Order is due on February 14, 2013; 3. Defendant Behr's memorandum in opposition is due on February 21, 2013; 4. Plaintiffs' reply memorandum, if any, is due on February 26, 2013; and 5. Said briefs shall not exceed ten pages in length. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 2/7/2013. (sc1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
IN RE: BEHR DAYTON
THERMAL PRODUCTS, LLC

:
:
:
:

Case No. 3:08-CV-326
District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
The Court heard oral argument today concerning a discovery dispute involving Plaintiffs’
notice of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition to Defendant Behr Dayton Thermal Products, LLC
(“Behr”), and the resulting deposition of Mr. Nodel. Having heard arguments from both sides,
and in accordance with the parties’ joint request, the Court finds that briefing on the issues raised
in the telephone hearing is necessary. In such briefing, counsel for Plaintiffs should specifically
address the remedies they seek (including a specific cost itemization of any deposition expenses);
and counsel for Defendant Behr should advise the Court as to the manner in which it responded or
objected to Plaintiffs’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) notice prior to the deposition.
Pursuant to the oral agreement of counsel, the Court hereby ORDERS the following
briefing schedule:
1.

Counsel for Plaintiffs shall file a copy of the transcript from the deposition of Mr.

Nodel by February 8, 2013;
2.

Plaintiffs’ memorandum in response to this Order is due on February 14, 2013;

3.

Defendant Behr’s memorandum in opposition is due on February 21, 2013;

4.

Plaintiffs’ reply memorandum, if any, is due on February 26, 2013; and

5.

Said briefs shall not exceed ten pages in length.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 7, 2013

s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge

2