Martin v. Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC et al

Filing 173

ORDER - Pursuant to the oral agreement of counsel, the Court hereby ORDERS the following briefing schedule: 1. Counsel for Plaintiffs shall file a copy of the transcript from the deposition of Mr. Nodel by February 8, 2013; 2. Plaintiffs' memor andum in response to this Order is due on February 14, 2013; 3. Defendant Behr's memorandum in opposition is due on February 21, 2013; 4. Plaintiffs' reply memorandum, if any, is due on February 26, 2013; and 5. Said briefs shall not exceed ten pages in length. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 2/7/2013. (sc1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON IN RE: BEHR DAYTON THERMAL PRODUCTS, LLC : : : : Case No. 3:08-CV-326 District Judge Walter H. Rice Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The Court heard oral argument today concerning a discovery dispute involving Plaintiffs’ notice of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition to Defendant Behr Dayton Thermal Products, LLC (“Behr”), and the resulting deposition of Mr. Nodel. Having heard arguments from both sides, and in accordance with the parties’ joint request, the Court finds that briefing on the issues raised in the telephone hearing is necessary. In such briefing, counsel for Plaintiffs should specifically address the remedies they seek (including a specific cost itemization of any deposition expenses); and counsel for Defendant Behr should advise the Court as to the manner in which it responded or objected to Plaintiffs’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) notice prior to the deposition. Pursuant to the oral agreement of counsel, the Court hereby ORDERS the following briefing schedule: 1. Counsel for Plaintiffs shall file a copy of the transcript from the deposition of Mr. Nodel by February 8, 2013; 2. Plaintiffs’ memorandum in response to this Order is due on February 14, 2013; 3. Defendant Behr’s memorandum in opposition is due on February 21, 2013; 4. Plaintiffs’ reply memorandum, if any, is due on February 26, 2013; and 5. Said briefs shall not exceed ten pages in length. IT IS SO ORDERED. February 7, 2013 s/ Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?