Martin v. Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC et al

Filing 175

ORDER - The Court is now in receipt of a February 14, 2013 letter from Plaintiffs' counsel, in which Plaintiffs advise the Court that this dispute was informally resolved between the parties. See doc. 174 . Accordingly, the Court will deem the matter RESOLVED, and the briefing schedule isRESCINDED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 2/15/13. (kje1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
IN RE: BEHR DAYTON
THERMAL PRODUCTS, LLC

:
:
:
:

Case No. 3:08-CV-326
District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
In response to a request for a telephone discovery conference, the Court, on February 7,
2013, heard oral argument concerning a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Defendant Behr Dayton
Thermal Products, LLC’s representative, Mr. Nodel. See doc. 173. The Court ordered briefing
on the issue. See id.
The Court is now in receipt of a February 14, 2013 letter from Plaintiffs’ counsel, in which
Plaintiffs advise the Court that this dispute was informally resolved between the parties. See doc.
174. Accordingly, the Court will deem the matter RESOLVED, and the briefing schedule is
RESCINDED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 15, 2013

s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge