Martin v. Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC et al
Filing
473
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING CERTAIN MOTIONS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL, UPON THE OCCURRENCE OF A CERTAIN EVENT overruling 399 Motion in Limine; overruling 400 Motion in Limine; overruling 401 Motion in Limine; overruling 402 Motion in Limine; overruling 403 Motion in Limine; overruling 404 Motion in Limine; overruling 405 Motion in Limine; overruling 406 Motion in Limine; overruling 407 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/14/23. (pb)
Case: 3:08-cv-00326-WHR Doc #: 473 Filed: 03/14/23 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 26809
IN THE UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT
FORTHE SOUTHERNDISTRICTOF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
IN RE BEHR DAYTON THERMAL
PRODUCTS,LLC, ^ a/.,
CaseNo. 3:08cv326
JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
DECISIONAND ENTRYOVERRULINGCERTAINMOTIONS,WITHOUT
PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL, UPON THE OCCURRENCE OF A CERTAIN
EVENT
Counsel have advised this Court that they are actively pursuing settlement in the
captioned cause, having reached certain agreements onmonetary issues, leaving only
non-monetary issues to be resolved. Accordingly, there is no need, at this time and under the
present posture, to rule on certain motions in limine in advance of any trial.
ACCORDINGLY, the following motions are OVERRULED, without prejudice to
renewal, by motion, should settlement efforts ultimately come to naught. Said motions are as
follows: Doc. #399, #400, #401, #402, #403, #404, #405, #406 and #407.
U
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?