Kline et al v. Mortgage Electronic Security Systems et al
Filing 293
DECISION AND ENTRY CLARIFYING THE COURT'S DECISION AND ENTRY OF APRIL 19, 2012 (DOC. 271 ); PLAINTIFF EUGENE KLINE'S FDCPA CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT REIMER, LORBER AND ARNOVITZ CO., LPA REINSTATED ONLY AS TO SAID PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM UND ER 15 U.S.C. 1692f(1 ); STATE LAW CLAIMS OF SAID PLAINTIFF AGAINST SAID DEFENDANT FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND UNDER THE OHIO CONSUMER SALES PRACTICES ACT EINSTATED; PLAINTIFF EUGENE KLINE'S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 54 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (DOC. 280 ) REQUESTING REINSTATEMENT OF SAID PLAINTIFF'S FDCPA CLAIM UNDER 15 U.S.C. 1692e OVERRULED; DEFENDANT REIMER, LORBER AND ARNOVITZ CO., LPA'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 274 ) OVERRULED; DEFENDANT REIMER, LORBER AND ARNOVITZ CO., LPA'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING A RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. [276) OVERRULED AS MOOT.Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/26/2013. (kf)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
