Grant v. USA
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING THE OBJECTIONS (DOC. 234 ) BY DEFENDANT TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 231 ) FILED DECEMBER 19, 2008, ADOPTING SAID REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION AS TO THAT PORTION SEEKING JAIL TIME CREDIT FROM JANUARY 25, 2005 THROUGH APRIL 5, 2006. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1/21/09. (bev1, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff, -vsANDRE D. GRANT Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING THE OBJECTIONS (DOC. #234) BY DEFENDANT TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #231) FILED DECEMBER 19, 2008, ADOPTING SAID REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION AS TO THAT PORTION SEEKING JAIL TIME CREDIT FROM JANUARY 25, 2005 THROUGH APRIL 5, 2006 _______________________________________________________________________________ This matter comes before the Court pursuant to a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #231) of Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, filed December 3, 2008 and Objections (Doc. #234) to that Report and Recommendation filed by Defendant on December 19, 2008. The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon full and complete consideration of the foregoing, the Court has determined that the Objections filed are not well-founded and therefore, OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED in its entirety. The Defendant's Motion is DENIED as to that portion seeking jail time credit from January 25, 2005 through April 5, 2006. Case No. 3-04 -CR-191 3:08-CV-442 District Judge Thomas M. Rose
IT IS SO ORDERED. January 21, 2009 *S/THOMAS M. ROSE ___________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?