May v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 10, 2012 (Doc. 16 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Acc ess to Justice Act (Doc. 14 ) is GRANTED in part to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of $1,381.25. Plaintiffs Motion for an EAJA award totaling $1,761.15 is DENIED; and The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 05/02/2012. (kf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
GALE S. MAY,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3 :09cv00090
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration,
District Judge Walter Herbert Rice
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
Defendant.
DECISION AND ENTRY
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of
United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #16), to whom this case was
originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.c. ยง636(b), and noting that no objections have been
filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has
expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendations filed on April 10, 2012 (Doc. #16) is
ADOPTED in full;
2.
Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal
Access to Justice Act (Doc. # 14) is GRANTED in part to the extent Plaintiff is
entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of$I,381.25. Plaintiffs
Motion for an EAJA award totaling $1,761.15 is DENIED; and
3.
The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
Walter Herbert Rice
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?