May v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 10, 2012 (Doc. 16 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Acc ess to Justice Act (Doc. 14 ) is GRANTED in part to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of $1,381.25. Plaintiffs Motion for an EAJA award totaling $1,761.15 is DENIED; and The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 05/02/2012. (kf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON GALE S. MAY, Plaintiff, Case No. 3 :09cv00090 vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, District Judge Walter Herbert Rice Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington Defendant. DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #16), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.c. ยง636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 10, 2012 (Doc. #16) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. # 14) is GRANTED in part to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of$I,381.25. Plaintiffs Motion for an EAJA award totaling $1,761.15 is DENIED; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Walter Herbert Rice United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?