Daskalakis et al v. HHP Corporation et al

Filing 10

SCHEDULING ORDER - This case is before the Court sua sponte. The case was referred to the undersigned on September 28, 2009, for pretrial management (Doc. No. 6). The Magistrate Judge has been advised by the Court's Mediator that the parties are scheduling another in-person mediation for sometime in November, 2010. The parties are reminded that the pendency of mediation does not affect the discovery cut-off of July 30, 2010, nor the dispositive motion deadline of August 31, 2010. The partie s are also reminded of their continued right to consent to plenary magistrate judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c). Consent must be unanimous and there will be no adverse substantive consequences of failing to consent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/8/2010. (kpf1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Tom Daskalakis, et al. Plaintiffs, -vsHHP Corporation, et al., Defendants. : : : : : Case No. 3:09-cv-175 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

SCHEDULING ORDER

This case is before the Court sua sponte. The case was referred to the undersigned on September 28, 2009, for pretrial management (Doc. No. 6). The Magistrate Judge has been advised by the Court's Mediator that the parties are scheduling another in-person mediation for sometime in November, 2010. The parties are reminded that the pendency of mediation does not affect the discovery cut-off of July 30, 2010, nor the dispositive motion deadline of August 31, 2010. The parties are also reminded of their continued right to consent to plenary magistrate judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Consent must be unanimous and there will be no adverse substantive consequences of failing to consent. July 8, 2010.

s/ Michael R. Merz
United States Magistrate Judge

1