Lenoir v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility

Filing 97

ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO TUNC PETITIONERS DUPLICATIVE MOTIONS FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (DOCS. 94 , 96 ). - This matter is before the Court upon Petitioners duplicative motions for an extension of time to file his objections to the Courts Report and Recommendation (doc. 91 ) -- which were due on November 19, 2012. Docs. 94 , 96 . For good cause shown, Petitioners motions (docs. 94 , 96 ) are GRANTED NUNC PRO TUNC. Petitioner is afforded until December 3, 2012 to file his objections to the Courts Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 11/20/2012. (kf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON LAMAR LENOIR, : Case No. 3:09-cv-286 : District Judge Walter H. Rice Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman Petitioner, vs. WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, : Respondent. : ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO TUNC PETITIONER’S DUPLICATIVE MOTIONS FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (DOCS. 94, 96) ____________________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court upon Petitioner’s duplicative motions for an extension of time to file his objections to the Court’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 91) -- which were due on November 19, 2012. Docs. 94, 96. For good cause shown, Petitioner’s motions (docs. 94, 96) are GRANTED NUNC PRO TUNC. Petitioner is afforded until December 3, 2012 to file his objections to the Court’s Report and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 20, 2012 s/ Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?