Lenoir v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Filing
97
ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO TUNC PETITIONERS DUPLICATIVE MOTIONS FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (DOCS. 94 , 96 ). - This matter is before the Court upon Petitioners duplicative motions for an extension of time to file his objections to the Courts Report and Recommendation (doc. 91 ) -- which were due on November 19, 2012. Docs. 94 , 96 . For good cause shown, Petitioners motions (docs. 94 , 96 ) are GRANTED NUNC PRO TUNC. Petitioner is afforded until December 3, 2012 to file his objections to the Courts Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 11/20/2012. (kf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
LAMAR LENOIR,
:
Case No. 3:09-cv-286
:
District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Petitioner,
vs.
WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,
:
Respondent.
:
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO TUNC PETITIONER’S DUPLICATIVE MOTIONS
FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (DOCS. 94, 96)
____________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court upon Petitioner’s duplicative motions for an extension of
time to file his objections to the Court’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 91) -- which were due
on November 19, 2012. Docs. 94, 96. For good cause shown, Petitioner’s motions (docs. 94,
96) are GRANTED NUNC PRO TUNC. Petitioner is afforded until December 3, 2012 to file
his objections to the Court’s Report and Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 20, 2012
s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?