Richardson v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 40 - It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for in forma pauperis status is DENIED. The Court also certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that Plaintiffs appeal is objectively frivolous. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12-9-2013. (de)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
EARL RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,

:

Industrial Commission of Ohio, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 3:09-cv-455

:

- vs -

:

District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

:
:

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
Michael R. Merz (Doc. #40), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b), and
noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for in forma pauperis status is DENIED.
The Court also certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that Plaintiff’s appeal is
objectively frivolous.

December 9, 2013.

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge