Sharpe v. City of Springfield, Ohio et al

Filing 11

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 5 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; OVERRULING SHARPE'S OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 8 ); DISMISSING SHARPE'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING LEAVE FOR SHARPE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TERMINATING THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3/26/10. (bac1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JEFFREY SHARPE, Case No. C-3:10-cv-027 Plaintiff, -vCITY OF SPRINGFIELD, et al., Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #5) IN ITS ENTIRETY; OVERRULING SHARPE'S OBJECTIONS (Doc. #8); DISMISSING SHARPE'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING LEAVE FOR SHARPE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TERMINATING THIS CASE ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington's Report and Recommendations regarding pro se Plaintiff Jeffrey Sharpe's ("Sharpe's") Complaint. (Doc. #5.) The Court previously granted Sharpe's Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Magistrate Judge has now reviewed Sharpe's Complaint and recommends that it be dismissed with prejudice because the Complaint was not brought within the applicable statutes of limitations and because Defendants Douglas Rastatter and Daniel Driscoll are immune from Sharpe's lawsuit. Sharpe has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendations and the Defendants have responded to Sharpe's Objections. This matter is, therefore, ripe for decision. As required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 72(b), the District Judge has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington finds that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations is adopted in its entirety. Sharpe's Complaint was brought outside of the applicable statues of limitations and Defendants Douglas Rastatter and Daniel Driscoll are immune from Sharpe's lawsuit. Sharpe's Complaint is, therefore, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, Sharpe's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. An appeal of this Entry and Order would not be taken in good faith. Therefore, leave for Sharpe to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Finally, The captioned cause is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Twenty-Sixth Day of March, 2010. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Jeffrey Sharpe at his last address of record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?