Morgan et al v. The Antioch Company Litigation Trust Company

Filing 130

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 120 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 4/1/2013. (mr1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION THE ANTIOCH COMPANY LITIGATION TRUST, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:10-cv-156 vs. Judge Timothy S. Black LEE MORGAN, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 120) This civil action is before the Court on Defendants Kim Lipson-Wilson, Stephen Bevelhymer, Karen Felix, and G. Robert Morris’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss (Doc. 120) and Plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition (Doc. 128). 1 Defendants seeks dismissal of Count Seven (Lipson-Wilson, Bevelhymer, and Felix) and County Nine (Morris and Lipson-Wilson) for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. In its Order granting Defendants’ motion for reconsideration (Doc. 71), the Court ruled that the opinion of the Supreme Court of Ohio in DeVries Dairy, LLC v. White Eagle Coop. Ass’n, 974 N.E.2d 1194 (Ohio 2012), invalidated a cause of action for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty under Ohio law. That ruling applies to the cause of action asserted against Defendants in Counts Seven and Nine. 1 While Plaintiff opposes the motion, it acknowledges that this Court has previously held that Ohio law does not recognize a cause of action for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and, absent a reconsideration of the Order, the Court’s previous ruling applies to Defendants. (Doc. 128 at 1-2). Accordingly, Defendants Lipson-Wilson, Bevelhymer, Felix, and Morris’s motion to dismiss Counts Seven and Nine for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Doc. 120) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 4/1/13 s/ Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?