Karns v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

DECISION AND ENTRY - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 9, 2012 (Doc. 20 ) is ADOPTED in full. 2. Plaintiff's Application For Attorney Fees Under Equal Access To Justice Act,28 U.S.C. 2412(d) (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED in the amount of $4,885.75. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff andagainst the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in the totalamount of $4,885.75. 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4/27/12. (kje1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DOUGLAS A. KARNS, Plaintiff, : : Case No. 3:10cv00318 vs. : MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #20), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 9, 2012 (Doc. #20) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s Application For Attorney Fees Under Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) (Doc. #17) is GRANTED in the amount of 4,885.75; 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in the total amount of $4,885.75; and The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. 4. April 27, 2012 *s/THOMAS M. ROSE Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?