Karns v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
DECISION AND ENTRY - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 9, 2012 (Doc. 20 ) is ADOPTED in full. 2. Plaintiff's Application For Attorney Fees Under Equal Access To Justice Act,28 U.S.C. 2412(d) (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED in the amount of $4,885.75. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff andagainst the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in the totalamount of $4,885.75. 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4/27/12. (kje1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
DOUGLAS A. KARNS,
Plaintiff,
:
:
Case No. 3:10cv00318
vs.
:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration,
Defendant.
:
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
:
:
DECISION AND ENTRY
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of
United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #20), to whom this case was
originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been
filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has
expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendations filed on April 9, 2012 (Doc. #20) is
ADOPTED in full;
2.
Plaintiff’s Application For Attorney Fees Under Equal Access To Justice Act,
28 U.S.C. §2412(d) (Doc. #17) is GRANTED in the amount of 4,885.75;
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and
against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in the total
amount of $4,885.75; and
The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
4.
April 27, 2012
*s/THOMAS M. ROSE
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?