Smith v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Office et al
Filing 104
(AMENDED) ORDER TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF UPON FILING OF A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (RE 103 ) - You are hereby notified that Defendant Douglas Kowalski and Defendants Steven Gardiner, Paul Henson, Mike Hild and Montgomery County Sheriff's Office f iled with the Court on June 1, 2012, a motion for summary judgment in this case (Docs 101 and 102 ). You should receive a copy of each motion directly from Defendant Douglas Kowalski and Defendants Steven Gardiner, Paul Henson, Mike Hild and Montgom ery County Sheriff's Office. Under the rules of this Court (S.D. Ohio L.R. 7.2) you are allowed twenty-one days from the date of service (June 1, 2012) within which to file a response to each motion, plus an extra three days because of the way t he motions were sent to you. Your response toeach motion must be filed with the Court not later than June 25, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/4/2012. (PER CHAMBERS AMENDED TO CORRECT DOCUMENT NUMBERS ORDER IS TO BE LINKED TO). (kje1)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.