Smith v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 120

DECISION AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION - This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition to the Court's Decision and Order (Doc. No. 119 ). Having reconsidered the prior Order in light of the Motion, the prior Order (Doc . No. 115 ) is VACATED and Plaintiff is granted leave to file partial summary judgment motions against Defendant Gardiner and Hild. The filing shall be accomplished by the Clerk's detaching the two motions from Doc. Nos. 113 and 114 , respectively, and filing the Motions. Those two Defendants shall have until August 6, 2012, to file responsive memoranda. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/12/2012. (sc1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
BILLY M. SMITH,

:

Plaintiff,

Case No. 3:10-cv-448
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

-vs:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SHERIFF=S OFFICE, et al.,
Defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION
This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion in Opposition to the Court’s Decision
and Order (Doc. No. 119).
Having reconsidered the prior Order in light of the Motion, the prior Order (Doc. No. 115)
is VACATED and Plaintiff is granted leave to file partial summary judgment motions against
Defendant Gardiner and Hild. The filing shall be accomplished by the Clerk’s detaching the two
motions from Doc. Nos. 113 and 114, respectively, and filing the Motions.

Those two

Defendants shall have until August 6, 2012, to file responsive memoranda.
July 12, 2012.
s/ Michael R. Merz
United States Magistrate Judge

1