Smith v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Office et al
Filing
142
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - re 138 - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Douglas Kowalski's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 100 ), be granted; Defendants Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, Michael L. Hild, Jr.' ;s, Paul Hensons, and Steven Gardiner's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 101 ), be granted; Plaintiff's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment Against Defendants Henson, (Doc. 110 ), Kowalski, (Doc. 111 ), Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, (Doc. 112 ), Gardiner, (Doc. 121 ), and Hild, (Doc. 122 ), be denied. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12/10/12. (kje1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
BILLY M. SMITH,
:
Case No. 3:10-cv-448
Plaintiff,
-vs-
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al.,
Defendants.
:
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate
Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 138), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
'636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto, despite a thirty-five day extension
of time to do so, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on
December 1, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Douglas Kowalski’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, (Doc. 100), be granted; Defendants Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office, Michael L.
Hild, Jr.’s, Paul Henson’s, and Steven Gardiner’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 101), be
granted; Plaintiff’s Motions for Partial Summary Judgment Against Defendants Henson, (Doc.
110), Kowalski, (Doc. 111), Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office, (Doc. 112), Gardiner, (Doc.
121), and Hild, (Doc. 122), be denied.
1
The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the Complaint with prejudice.
December 10, 2012
Thomas M. Rose
___________________________
JUDGE THOMAS M. ROSE
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?