Convey IT, Inc. v. Chatfield et al

Filing 50

RECOMMITTAL ORDER - Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report and recommendations analyzing the Objections and Response and making recommendations based on that analysis after oral argument. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 5/17/2012. (sc1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

CONVEY IT, INC.,
Case No. 3:10-cv-457
Plaintiff,
District Judge Walter Herbert Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
-vsDANIEL CHATFIELD, et a/.,
Defendants.

RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 46) to the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 45). As pennitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the
Defendants have filed a Response to those Objections (Doc. No. 49).
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be
more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with
instructions to file a supplemental report and recommendations analyzing the Objections and
Response and making recommendations based on that analysis after oral argument.

Walter Herbert Rice
United States District Judge
1