Huber, Jr v. Warden, Chilicothe Correctional Institution

Filing 56

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 55 , and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objectio ns under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be GRANTED on terms that Petitioner be released unless the Second District Court of Appeals reopens his direct appeal and reaffirms his conviction not later than six months from the date of final judgment in this case. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6-29-2015. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JOSEPH HUBER, JR., : Petitioner, Case No. 3:11-cv-8 - vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Respondent. : ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #55), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be GRANTED on terms that Petitioner be released unless the Second District Court of Appeals reopens his direct appeal and reaffirms his conviction not later than six months from the date of final judgment in this case. June 26, 2015 *s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?