Harris v. Clark County Sheriff et al

Filing 16

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 , Plaintiff Ronald E. Harris, II's filing titled DENOVO REVIEW OF THE RECORD 14 is DENIED, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of this Decision and Entry would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED; and the case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 6-4-2014. (de)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
RONALD E. HARRIS, II,

:

Plaintiff,

: Case No. 3:11cv00155

vs.
SHERIFF GENE KELLY, et al.,
Defendants.

: District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
:
:

DECISION AND ENTRY
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #15), to whom this case was originally
referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed
thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has
expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

The Report and Recommendations filed on May 8, 2014 (Doc. #15) is
ADOPTED in full;

2.

Plaintiff Ronald E. Harris, II’s filing titled “DENOVO REVIEW OF THE
RECORD” (Doc. #14) is DENIED;

3.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing
reasons an appeal of this Decision and Entry would not be taken in good
faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis is
denied; and,

4.

The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.

June 4, 2014

*s/Thomas M. Rose
_________________________
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge

2