Harris v. Clark County Sheriff et al
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Plaintiff shall file his objections to the Report and Recommendations on or before July 29, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 6/27/11. (bac1) Modified on 6/29/2011 to correct typo (mdf1).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
RONALD E. HARRIS, II,
SHERIFF GENE KELLY, et al.,
Case No. 3:11cv00155
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time
(Doc. # 7). Plaintiff seeks additional time in the amount of 180 days to reopen an appeal.
It is not clear what appeal he seeks to reopen. The Court notes that Plaintiff refers to the
“Reopening of the Supreme Court of Ohio Entry Case 2009-CA-00036 & Entry June 9,
2011 & 2009-0698 AD Entry April 29, 2011.(Doc. # 7). To the extent that Plaintiff seeks
an extension of 180 days to attempt to reopen the afore-mentioned state cases, the motion
To the extent that Plaintiff is seeking an extension of time to file Objections to the
Report and Recommendations which are presently due by June 30, 2011 (Doc. # 6),
Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Plaintiff shall file his objections to
the Report and Recommendations on or before July 29, 2011.
June 27, 2011
s/Sharon L. Ovington
Sharon L. Ovington
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?