Miller et al v. AutoZone, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant AutoZones Motion to Dismiss for lack of service of process be, and it hereby is, DENIED. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12/9/11. (pb1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
MARY E. MILLER, et al.,
Plaintiff,

:

Case No. 3:11-cv-237
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

-vs:
AutoZone, Inc., et al.,
Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and
noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on December 5, 2011, hereby ADOPTS said Report and
Recommendations.
It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant AutoZone’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of
service of process be, and it hereby is, DENIED.
December 9, 2011.

*s/THOMAS M. ROSE
__________________________________
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge

1